Page from the City's Coquitlam River Water Quality Monitoring Report |
Ponderous, doom-and-gloom predictions from the sky-is-falling
eco-hysterical crowd are routine fare in the mainstream media, even as
increasing scientific evidence shows that we have reason for optimism. I’ve
been chronicling many of the good-news reports over the past year on my Facebook page. And I certainly hope to add
another link to this list of good-news stories tomorrow, when our two local
newspapers publish. [Yup, here's a link to the Tri-City News' story. And here's a link to the Now's story.]
That’s because the City of Coquitlam has just released a
report finding that, contrary to the impression left by the annual ritual of
naming the Coquitlam River to the list of the province’s “most endangered
rivers,” the river is actually exceedingly healthy.
I personally am gratified with this finding because, as
chair of the Coquitlam River Aggregate Committee (which seeks to balance the
needs of the important gravel-extraction operations along the river, with those
of the environment), I stuck my neck out last spring when Mark Angelo, Rivers Chair of the Outdoor
Recreation Council, once again slapped the “endangered” label on the river.
I responded by saying that everything I was hearing at the
committee—from groups as diverse as our own environmental experts to the federal
Department of Fisheries and Oceans—had led me to conclude that the river was not, in fact, endangered. My decision to speak up, for the good work that had
been done by the committee and many others, led to no small bit of controversy.
It also led directly to my decision to press the City to
conduct its own, unique water-quality tests. After all,
the City has a great many storm-sewer outfalls that pour water directly
into the river; it only made sense that we should know what’s coming out of
them.
Yesterday, we found out. The Coquitlam River Water Quality Monitoring Update report declares that “sampling results for
the 2012 Coquitlam River water quality monitoring program indicate overall
positive watershed health, with the majority of parameters being achieved at
all locations during both dry and wet weather conditions.” Significantly, the few problems that were
identified (slightly low dissolved oxygen levels throughout the river and an
elevated dissolved-copper level in the Riverbend area) cannot be attributed to
the aggregate operators.
Let there be no misunderstanding: this is great news! It
shows that the gravel operators are acting responsibly; it shows that
committed, focused efforts by government workers, environmentalists, nature
lovers and ordinary volunteers can make a difference; and it shows that the
Coquitlam River is alive, vibrant and healthy. Truly, this is something to
celebrate.
No comments:
Post a Comment